Legal Opinion

Amerlux Steel Corp. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 2, 1931No. 3399Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

The merchandise involved in this suit consists of checkered, or raised diamond, steel floor plates.

It was classified and assessed for duty, by the collector of customs, under paragraph 304 of the Tariff Act of 1922, at three-tenths of 1 cent per pound, as steel plates not specially provided for.

The importer protested, claiming the assessment should be one-fifth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 312 of said act as “building forms” or “structural shapes.” /

The protest was overruled by the Customs Court, and the importer has appealed.

The pertinent portions of the contesting paragraphs read as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. United States v. FrankCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  3. United States v. Henry L. Exstein Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Birtwell v. SaltonstallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1889
  5. Soule v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API