Legal Opinion

Nettles v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 9, 1990No. CR 90-53PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

The appellant, Michael Nettles, has petitioned this court for a writ of prohibition to prevent the Circuit Court of Pike County from proceeding with a trial in regard to a theft of property charge against him. Nettles claims that he has not been afforded his right to a speedy trial. We disagree.

Arkansas R.Cr.P. Rule 28.1(c) addresses the time limitations, excluded periods, and consequences of violations in bringing a criminal defendant to trial and provides in pertinent part as follows:

Any defendant charged after October 1, 1987, in circuit court and held to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Marchant v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Findley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Kelch v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API