Legal Opinion
Hastings v. United States Trustee (In Re Agyekum)
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 6, 1998No. BAP No. NC-97-1820-RRYJU, Bankruptcy No. 97-47332-NDPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL, Bankruptcy Judge.
The bankruptcy court determined that a bankruptcy petition preparer’s fee was unreasonable and ordered the preparer to disgorge the amount in excess of the limit set forth in the Bankruptcy Petition Preparer Guidelines of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California. The petition preparer appeals. We AFFIRM.
I. FACTS
Naana Agyekum and appellant Aaron Hastings (“Hastings”), dba Court Services, a bankruptcy petition preparer (“BPP”), entered into a written Service Agreement (“Agreement”) in May 1997. Under the Agreement, Hastings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Consumer Seven Corp. v. United States Trustee (In Re Fraga)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1987
- Glad v. Mork (In Re Glad)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Goudie v. Morrow (In Re Telford)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In the Matter of Kimberly A. Agnew, Debtors. Appeal of Peter Francis GeraciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re CastorenaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
- In Re GuttierezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2000
- In Re MoffettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2001
- In Re FarnessUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2000
- In Re DoserUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2002
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.