Legal Opinion
Preston v. Mendlinger
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 7, 1979No. 77 CIV 747 (LBS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAND, District Judge.
Defendants Harvey Printz and Barrett Kobrin move for a dismissal of the action under F.R.Civ.P. 41(b) on the ground that plaintiffs have failed to prosecute the action against them.1 Defendant Printz additionally moves for dismissal under F.R. Civ.P. 12(b) on the ground that procedures followed in effecting service of process were deficient. For the reasons set forth herein, defendants’ motions are denied.
FACTS
On February 15, 1977, plaintiffs filed a complaint alleging various securities violations. In addition to the moving defendants, the complaint names 36…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arra Ray Messenger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- A. M. Pearson v. Denny DennisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- The Moore Company of Sikeston, Missouri, a Corporation, and J. E. Moore, Jr. v. Sid Richardson Carbon & Gasoline Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Phillips v. MurchisonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Elizabethtown Trust Company v. KonschakDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ahern v. WarnerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Crysen/Montenay Energy Co. v. E & C Trading Ltd. (In Re Crysen/Montenay Energy Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Europacific Asset Management Corp. v. Tradescape, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Hobson v. WilsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Southold Development Corp. v. Mittemyer (In Re Southold Development Corp.)District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.