Legal Opinion

Debord v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 26, 2005No. A05A0830PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Barnes, Judge.

Following a bench trial and subsequent denial of his motion for new trial, Grady Dwight Debord appeals from his conviction for possession of methamphetamine contending that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

When reviewing a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress, this court’s responsibility is to ensure that there was a substantial basis for the decision. The evidence is construed most favorably to uphold the findings and judgment, and the trial court’s findings on disputed facts and credibility are adopted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. State v. FolkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. State v. JourdanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Edgell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. St. Fleur v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Quick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Lockard v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Meadows v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API