Legal Opinion
Tyner v. City of Buffalo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 12, 1989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Special Term erred in dismissing plaintiffs complaint upon the grounds that the City of Buffalo had not received prior written notice of the defect which allegedly caused plaintiffs accident and injuries (City of Buffalo Charter, art 20, § 362). Plaintiffs complaint alleges in substance that defendant was liable by reason of its failure to properly post or maintain signs warning users of Bird Avenue that it was restricted to one-way traffic. The Court of Appeals and this court have consistently held that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alexander v. EldredNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Doremus v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Zumbo v. Town of FarmingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Gould v. County of OrleansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cummins v. County of OnondagaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Walker v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Adams v. Town of LisbonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Dishaw v. Central New York Regional Transportation Authority (Centro)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Bisulco v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.