Legal Opinion

Marathon Oil Comp v. Ruhrgas

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1998No. 96-20361Published

1Opinion of the Court

145 F.3d 211

MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Marathon International Oil Company,

and Marathon Petroleum Norge A/S,

Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees,

v.

A.G. RUHRGAS, Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 96-20361.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fifth Circuit.

June 22, 1998.

Clifton T. Hutchinson, J. Gregory Taylor, David John Schenck, Hughes & Luce, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

1

Ben H. Sheppard, Jr., Guy Stanford Lipe, Michael John Mucchetti, Harry M. Reasoner, Vinson & Elkins, Houston, TX, Charles Alan Wright, University of Texas Law School, Austin, TX, for Ruhrgas.

2

Peter…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API