Stimson Canal & Irrigation v. Lemoore Canal & Irrigation Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Fresno County denying motions to strike out cost bill. Geo. E'. Church, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The point involved in the three cases above entitled is identical, and they may be considered together.
The judgment in each case quieted the plaintiff’s title to certain water rights subject to the title of the appellant, and the court awarded plaintiff its costs. The appellant moved to strike out the plaintiff’s cost bill. From the order in each case denying the motion the appeal is prosecuted.
It is conceded that the action concerning as it does the water rights of the parties in a certain river in Fresno County, is an action in the nature of a suit to quiet title to real property.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hoyt v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- F. A. Hihn Co. v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by3 opinions
- Witherill v. BrehmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Tom Reed Gold Mines Co. v. United Eastern Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Northern California Power Co. v. WallerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917