Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Care & Protection of Sharlene

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 17, 2006Published

1ConcurrenceSpina, J.

(concurring, with whom Cowin, J., joins). I agree with the court’s opinion. I write separately to call attention to *774an issue that was not raised by the parties but has a significant impact on the public interest. The issue is whether a judicial hearing on a petition to withdraw life support systems from a child should be closed to the public simply because it takes place in the context of a care and protection proceeding.

The Supreme Judicial Court Guidelines on the Public’s Right of Access to Judicial Proceedings and Records (2000) begins with the following two sentences: “Judicial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Superintendent of Belchertown State School v. SaikewiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Cowley v. PulsiferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Custody of a MinorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Custody of a MinorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. In re RenaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API