Day v. Gibraltar Oil Corp.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentSmith, Justice
Dissenting from a conclusion in which eight of my brethren concurred must be thought to require a great deal of temerari-ousness, and it does. In doing so I do not question the validity of the learned dissertation on oil and gas law contained in the majority opinion. My misgivings are addressed solely to the efficacy of the attempted exception contained in the deed given by Day’s predecessor in title to exclude a one-half royalty interest in the minerals from the grant.
Mississippi Code Annotated section 89-1— 39 (1972) is as follows:
A conveyance of quitclaim and release shall be sufficient to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Curdy v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Barker v. LashbrookSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
- Jones v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Higdon v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- McAllister v. HoneaMississippi Supreme Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.