Legal Opinion

State v. Hawes

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 7, 2015No. Appellate Case 2012-212978; 27476PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

With no provocation, Respondent Alonzo Hawes shot and killed his estranged wife in the presence of their children. Following a guilty plea to voluntary manslaughter, the trial court granted Hawes’s section 16-25-90 motion for eligibility for early parole, which the court of appeals affirmed. State v. Hawes, 399 S.C. 211, 730 S.E.2d 904 (Ct.App.2012). We issued a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision. Because the trial court failed to exercise discretion, which was likely the result of its reliance on a prior version of section 16-25-90, we vacate the court of appeals’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. BlackSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  3. State v. LaneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Samples v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. BLACKWELL-SELIMSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Patton ex rel. Alexia L. v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. BashCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Morris v. BB&T CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  4. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  5. State v. HeywardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API