Legal Opinion

Dierks v. Thompson

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided January 21, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 3238PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Statement of Facts

PETTINE, District Judge.

This action is brought by twenty-one former employees of the Amerotron Company Division (Amerotron) of Textron, Inc. (Textron) now residing in various states throughout the country as a class action on behalf of themselves and all other employees similarly situated as of April 15, 1963 and who were on that date members of the Textron Profit Sharing Plan and Trust (“the Trust” or “the Plan”).

The plaintiffs claim that by virtue of a sale by Textron of Amerotron on April 15, 1963, there was effectuated not only a termination of employment of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hurd v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1955
  2. Russell v. Princeton Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
  3. Seybold v. Western Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Schneider v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  5. Siegel v. First Pennsylvania Banking and Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neil Bergt v. The Retirement Plan for Pilots Employed by Markair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Walter W. Dierks v. Rupert C. Thompson, TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  3. The Rochester Corporation v. W. L. Rochester, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  4. Rochester v. Rochester Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API