The Hollister Bank of Buffalo v. . Vail
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff's counsel maintains that an appeal does not lie in this case, because, as he argues, the appeal is from an order, as distinguished from a judgment, and it is insisted, that by the act creating the Superior Court of Buffalo, appeals to this court can only be taken from the judgments of the Superior Court. The language of the act is, "appeals from the judgments of the said court, rendered at general term, shall be taken directly to the Court of Appeals, in the same manner as from judgments of the Supreme Court in the cases prescribed by law." (Laws of 1854, 227, § 19.) We do not…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Wells v. ShriverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Tompkins v. . HyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Whitfield v. Broadway & Seventh Avenue RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
- Manufacturers' & Builders' Bank v. KierstedNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1875
- Tompkins v. HyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1859