Legal Opinion

Burruss Land & Lumber Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Virginia

Decided October 30, 1970No. Civ. A. No. 67-C-5-LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and JUDGMENT

DALTON, Chief Judge.

This ease involves an interesting question which has arisen in the administration of the internal revenue excise tax on automotive parts and accessories. Int. Rev. Code of 1954, § 4061(b). Plaintiff manufactures laminated wood flooring which is widely used as flooring in truck trailers and which it contends is a general purpose wood product exempt from tax. The Internal Revenue Service contends that the flooring is a part or accessory within the meaning of Section 4061(b) and therefore subject to tax. On July 15, 1966 the defendant assessed against…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Universal Battery Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Irwin Aran, Doing Business as Auto Nurse Manufacturing Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. United States v. H. H. Keeton, Sr., Trading and Doing Business as Virginia Auto Top CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  5. Crown Products Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. BURRUSS LAND AND LUMBER CO. INC. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1972
  2. Burruss Land and Lumber Company, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API