Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Pelletier
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 28, 1928PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.
These are two indictments which were tried together. The first indictment charged the defendants with maliciously threatening to accuse Patsy D’Alessio of the crime of operating an automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor and parking the automobile on the Fresh Pond Reservation without lights, with intent thereby to extort money from him; and the second indictment charged the defendants with conspiracy to commit the crime of extortion set forth in the first indictment. The jury having returned a verdict of guilty on each indictment against each defendant, the cases are here…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Attorney General v. PelletierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Commonwealth v. CorcoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- London v. Bay State Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Clarke v. Massachusetts Title InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Robinson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FarrellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Commonwealth v. GranitoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Commonwealth v. RiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Commonwealth v. KleciakMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
- Commonwealth v. LopesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.