Legal Opinion
McElfresh v. Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 13, 2009No. 2229 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
Edna McElfresh petitions for review of an order of a Department of Transportation (DOT) Hearing Officer. 1 The Hearing Officer denied a request for documents sought pursuant to what is commonly referred to as the Right to Know Law. 2 The Hearing Officer concluded that McEl-fresh’s request seeking various DOT records, including a Vehicle Sales and Use Tax/Application for Registration (Form MV-4ST), sought information protected from disclosure under the Commonwealth’s tax statutes. We affirm.
McElfresh is the plaintiff in a civil suit against the Toyota of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania State University v. State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pennsylvania Land Title Association v. East Stroudsburg Area SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Pennsylvania Land Title Ass'n v. East Stroudsburg Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- UMCO Energy, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Digital-Ink, Inc. v. Department of General ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
3Cited by4 opinions
- Office of the Budget v. CampbellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- AmerisourceBergen Sourcing, LLC v. Commonwealth of PACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
- PA Department of Revenue v. A. Wagaman and The Morning CallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- PA Dept. of Revenue v. A. Wagaman & The Morning CallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021