Legal Opinion
Dye v. Hirsch
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 30, 1955No. 35846PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
Special ground 1 of the amended motion for a new trial contends that the court erred in refusing to grant a continuance and in refusing to recognize the plea for stay filed on account of bankruptcy by the defendant; in overruling said plea for stay and motion made by counsel for the defendant for stay and continuance pending application for discharge in bankruptcy. The plea of stay is itself sufficient as a pleading, under Hunter v. Lissner, 1 Ga. App. 1 (1) (58 S. E. 54). However, under the same authority, in order to be entitled to the continuance or stay in accordance with the motion of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brown v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- New Zealand Fire Insurance v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Florida Yellow Pine Co. v. Flint River Naval Stores Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Lamar v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Commercial Union Assurance Co. Ltd., of London v. Chattahoochee Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Complete AAA Manufacturing Corp. v. Citizens Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Taylor v. Buckhead Glass Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Taylor v. Buckhead Glass Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Weyandt v. BallardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964