Legal Opinion
HARCLAY HOUSE ASSOCS. v. City of East Orange
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 9, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
781 A.2d 1085 (2001)
344 N.J. Super. 296
HARCLAY HOUSE ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 12, 2001.
Decided October 9, 2001.
Steven R. Irwin, West Orange, argued the cause for appellant (Mandelbaum & Mandelbaum, attorneys; Mr. Irwin, on the brief).
John F. Casey, Roseland, argued the cause for respondent (Wolff & Samson, attorneys; Mr. Casey, on the brief).
Before Judges A.A. RODRIGUEZ and LEFELT.
2Per curiam
Harclay House Associates (Harclay) appeals from the judgment of the Tax Court, affirming a real…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Harclay House v. East Orange CityNew Jersey Tax Court · 2000
4Cited by4 opinions
- West Colonial Enterprises, LLC v. City of East OrangeNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003
- West Colonial Enterprises, LLC v. City of East OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Passarella v. Township of WallNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003
- TD Bank v. City of HackensackNew Jersey Tax Court · 2015