Legal Opinion
Katherine Ann Shaw v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 14, 1989No. 89-5092PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Chief Judge.
Katherine Ann Shaw appeals the District Court’s denial of a motion she filed under Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure seeking the return of money seized by federal agents. We affirm.
Shaw was on board a plane at Memphis Airport bound for Los Angeles when federal agents seized $45,008 from her. Even though no criminal charges were brought against her, she filed a motion for return of her property under Fed.R.Crim.P. Rule 41(e). Only after the District Court issued an Order compelling the government to show cause why her property should not be returned did…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States of America, Alice Harris, Claimant/appellant v. U.S. Currency, $83,310.78Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Jim Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Search and Seizure, Al James HarperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Seizure Warrant. Appeal of Cyril OnwuasoanyaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
3Cited by38 opinions
- TD Bank NA v. Vernon Hill, IICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Regional Airport Authority of Louisville and Jefferson County v. Lfg, LLC Navistar International Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Piedade Pedro De Almeida, Harber Corporation, Gatex Corporation, Mabon Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. One 1974 Learjet 24D, Serial Number 24D-290, Mexican Registration XA-RMFCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- State v. Greenetrack, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2014
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.