Legal Opinion
Inre: Steve Morsa
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 5, 2013No. 2012-1609PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.
Mr. Steven Morsa (“Morsa”) appeals the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) affirming the rejection of claims 181, 184, 188-203, 206, 210-25, 228, 232-47, 250, 254-68, 271, and 272. Substantial evidence supports the Board’s factual determinations, and we agree with the Board’s ultimate legal con-elusion that claims 181, 184, 188-203, 206, 210-25, 228, 232-47, 250, and 254-68 would have been obvious in light of the prior art. The Board performed an incorrect enablement analysis, however, when it determined that claims 271 and 272 were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Amgen Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc. (Now Known as Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Eurand, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Blue Calypso, LLC. v. Groupon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- In Re Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Trivascular, Inc. v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AgCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- McM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.