Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
TRAYNOR, J, Dissenting.
Abstract ideas are common property freely available to all. What men forge out of these *673ideas with skill, industry, and imagination, into concrete forms uniquely their own, the law protects as private property. It gives the special form the stamp of recognition; it does so to stimulate creative activity. It does something more to stimulate creative activity: it assures all men free utilization of abstract ideas in the process of crystallizing them in fresh forms. For creativeness thrives on freedom; men find new implications in old ideas when they range with open minds…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Matarese v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.