Legal Opinion
Southland Associates v. Clay
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 1998No. 88968PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, Judge:
¶ 1 This appeal involves four consolidated tax protest appeals for the years 1992, 1993, 1994 and 1995. The Tulsa County Board of Equalization (Board) assigned a fair cash value for the Tulsa Promenade Mall for ad valorem tax purposes in an amount objected to by its owners, Southland Associates and its successor in interest, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company (collectively CIG-*170NA). CIGNA protested the valuation for each of the subject years and paid the taxes under protest. CIGNA filed formal appeals from Board’s rulings for each year. The trial court consolidated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bliss Hotel Company v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Appeal of National Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Marshall v. OK Rental & Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Sunco Manufacturing Co. v. HargroveCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
- County Board of Equalization v. Frontier Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. A.R., a Male Juvenile, A.R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994