Legal Opinion

Ford v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 16, 1982No. Appeal, No. 347 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Celestine Ford (Claimant) appeals here from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) denying her benefits pursuant to Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e), the willful misconduct provision. We affirm.

From October of 1978 until May 29, 1980, Claimant was employed as a social worker for the Philadelphia Parent Child Center, Inc. (Center) where she was assigned to the Center’s home visitor and learning center programs. During the course of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gane v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Tucker v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Dodson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Murraysville Telephone Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Jackim v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rebel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Rebel v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API