Legal Opinion
United States v. Stephen Penner
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1970No. 28508PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir. 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.
Stephen Penner was indicted, convicted and sentenced for knowingly trans porting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce in violation of Title 18, U.S.C., Section 2312.
His appeal urges: (1) that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Charles Edwin Orser v. United States of America, Johnny Lee Parker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Gracie L. Jones v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Robert E. Burns and Margaret Ann GreenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Charles Hubert HillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.