Haslach v. Wolf
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court for Platte county. Action in the nature of assumpsit on promissory note. Tried below before Hollenbeck and Albert, JJ. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Pound, 0.
In Garnett v. Meyers, 65 Nebr., 280, this court expressly left open the much-vexed question whether a note or bill for the payment of a certain sum “with exchange” is rendered non-negotiable by the agreement to pay exchange. The subject has been discussed exhaustively in a number of recent cases, and, now that the question is squarely presented, we have only to range ourselves upon the one side or the other and indicate our reasons briefly. Most of the text-writers have held that such a stipulation has no effect upon the negotiability of the instrument. 1 Daniel, Negotiable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clark v. SkeenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
- Hastings v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Morgan v. EdwardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- Flagg v. School District, No. 70North Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Culbertson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Haslach v. WolfNebraska Supreme Court · 1905