Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Gillespie

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1975No. 95 and 96PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POMEROY, Justice.

These two appeals raise identical questions concerning the taxation of joint bank accounts under the Inheritance and Estate Tax Act of 1961 [the Act].1 Section 241 of the Act imposes a tax on the interest passing to the surviving party or parties to a joint tenancy on the death of *457one of the joint tenants. In each of these cases (Nos. 95 and 96) the Commonwealth has appealed from a ruling that a so-called “convenience account”, funded entirely by the surviving tenant, is not subject to the tax.

The facts in No. 95 are as follows. Anna Gillespie opened a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cochrane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Scott EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Olson EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Dzierski EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. Nolan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Estate of BrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Lutz v. OrinickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Estate of KostelnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. In re Estate of CaldwellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Estate of Anderson v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API