Legal Opinion

Wied v. Valhi, Inc.

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 29, 1983PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Chief Justice:

This appeal arises from the refusal by the Court of Chancery to impose a constructive trust upon profits the intervenor-plaintiff alleges were received by the plaintiff in a private settlement of representative litigation.

I

The plaintiff, Valhi, Inc. (“Valhi”), owned 700,000 shares, or in excess of 20%, of the stock of PSA, Inc. (“PSA”). In October, 1978, in response to a perceived threat of a takeover by Valhi, PSA directors proposed certain amendments to PSA’s charter and bylaws. Valhi opposed the amendments in a proxy contest. To implement that opposition, Valhi…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
  3. Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Adams v. JankouskasSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  5. Cheff v. MathesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
  2. Alabama By-Products Corp. v. Cede & Co. Ex Rel. Shearson Lehman Bros.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. Emerald Partners v. BerlinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1989
  4. 7547 PARTNERS v. BeckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. In Re Amsted Industries, Inc. LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API