Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherick, J.

Plaintiff as a resident elector and gas consumer of the city of Zanesville, on behalf of himself and ten thousand others similarly concerned,' sought and obtained a mandatory injunction against the gas company, whereby it is directed to furnish natural gas in the city of Zanesville in accordance with the terms of a rate ordinance duly enacted on March 11, 1938, and advertised, but not accepted by the gas company. From this decree the defendant appeals on. questions of law, which may be epitomized into two interrogatories which this court must now answer. The appellant’s first claimed error is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brauer v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Hess v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. City of Zanesville v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Jefferson-Pilot Communications Co. v. Phoenix City Broadcasting, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API