Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Huckins Hotel Co. v. Clampitt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1924No. 12092PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This suit was instituted by the defendant in error to recover from the plaintiff in error for the value of a trunk and its contents, which had been intrusted to the plaintiff in error for delivery to the railroad station. The defendant in error was a guest at the Huckins Hotel for a short time, and late in the evening of a certain day she advised the hotel clerk that she intended to depart the next morning on the Santa Ee train and desired her baggage transferred to the Santa Ee depot so that it might be checked out early next morning. The plaintiff in error agreed to transfer the baggage to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Water Co. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Minnetonka Oil Co. v. HavilandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. O'Rourke v. FeistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  5. Giles v. FauntleroyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Copeland v. Lodge Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. Coe v. EsauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  4. Bouziden v. Alfalfa Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  5. Jack Cooper Transport Company v. GriffinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API