Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bd. of Mental Retardation v. Cuyahoga County Bd. of Commrs.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1975No. 73-971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebbezze, J.

The question presented here is whether a voter-approved levy in excess of the ten-mill limitation may be placed upon the tax list of the current year.

Appellants argue, first, that mandamus is not the proper remedy. They contend that the individual relators have an adequate remedy at law pursuant to R. C. 5705.343, and that the board of mental retardation has no standing and cannot sue.

It is agreed by the parties that the board of mental l’etardation has no plain and adequate remedy at law pursuant to R. C. 5705.341, or any other procedure. Consequently, if the board has the standing and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wise v. Summit County Budget Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. National Distillers Products Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Education v. Butler County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jackson County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State Ex Rel. Trussell v. Meigs County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. State ex rel. Fairfield County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities v. Fairfield County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API