Ducournau v. Levistones
Supreme Court of Louisiana
from the Third District Court of New Orleans, Kennedy, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
Slidell, J.
The Code of Practice is positive that if the appellant does not file the transcript seasonably, tbe appeal shall be considered as abandoned, and the appellant shall not be afterwards allowed to renew it. C. P. 594, 4 La. 41.
The omission is attributed by the appellant to the fault of his attorney. We stated, on a former occasion, that this could not be recognized as a ground of relief. It is unnecessary to repeat the reasons then given. See same case 3 An. p. 245. Appeal dismissed,.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Mundy v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Hymel v. Illinois Cent. R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
- Girod v. Monroe Brick Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Gazzo v. Bisso Ferry Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hamilton v. DabbsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950