Young v. Harris
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Lonoke Circuit Court in Chancery.. The receipt for purchase money, being without mistake or surprise, is conclusive of its recitals. 9 Conn., 401, and cases cites. Unless the receipt is purely such, and not contracted. 33 Iowa, 28; 27 Penn. St., 151.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This was a suit in equity by Walton Harris against Louisa Young, to enforce a vendor’s lien.
The complaint alleged that the plaintiff, on the twenty-fifth day of August, 1874, sold and conveyed to the defendant a certain described lot in the town of Lonoke, at the price of $300. That, ¿lthough the purchase money was acknowledged in the deed to have been received, it was not, in fact, paid; but the defendant agreed that for $200 of it, she would turn over to him, so soon thereafter as she should perfect the title to a lot she had sold them, a note on Thompson & Brother for that amount, and for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Plowman v. RiddleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Harvey v. KellyMississippi Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jarratt v. LangstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Cox v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Koch v. RothIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Carson v. Cook County Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Born v. Union Elevator Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.