Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Little v. Rhay

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 16, 1973No. 629-3Published

1ConcurrenceMunson, J.

(concurring) — I am constrained to concur with Judge Mclnturff. The factual posture of the record requires this court to order an evidentiary hearing.

In Schiebelhut v. United States, 357 F.2d 743 (6th Cir. 1966) at 745 the court stated:

If the material available to the [trial judge] was limited to the pre-plea colloquy, the charges of . . . petition and the government’s opposing affidavits, and if petitioner’s charges had the required specificity, we would, . . . remand for the holding of a hearing. The record, however, contains more.

The record before us does not contain “more.” I am advised…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Loper v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API