Legal Opinion

Macaluso v. Thibodeaux

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 25, 1957No. 42865PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMITER, Justice.

Damages in the sum of $31,420, plus attorneys’ fees and penalties, were demanded in this action for the alleged breach of a building contract to make changes and improvements to a dwelling owned by plaintiff. Named as defendants were the contractor, Harris I. Thibodeaux, the surety, London Guarantee and Accident Company, Ltd., and a subcontractor, Abry Bros., a partnership which had subcontracted a portion of the work (these are sometimes referred to hereinafter as contractor, surety, and subcontractor, respectively) .

In a written contract of date September 15, 1950',…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Muntz v. Algiers & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  2. Blanchard v. Norman-Breaux Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  3. Bennett v. WeinbergerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cameron v. Reserve Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  2. Congregation of St. Peter's Roman Catholic Church of Gueydan v. SimonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Sorensen v. Robert N. Ewing, General ContractorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Ryder v. Baco Realty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Sheridan v. DeshotelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API