Legal Opinion
Stromski v. Jefferson Auto Body
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 6, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeals (1) from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 28, 2001, which ruled that claimant’s disease was not causally related to his employment and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits, and (2) from a decision of said Board, filed May 1, 2002, which denied claimant’s request for reconsideration or full Board review.
Claimant, an auto body repairer for approximately 27 years, was diagnosed with stomach cancer. Primarily attributing his condition to exposure to chromium and talc encountered in the course of his employment, claimant filed an application for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Lombardi v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of the Estate of Hertz v. Gannett Rochester NewspapersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Newton v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Zingler v. Eastman Kodak Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Schwartz v. Hebrew Academy of the Five TownsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Pizarro v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Matter of Jones v. Burrell Orchards, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Claim of Jones v. Gardner MotorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007