Graham v. Consolidated Traction Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Ou rule to show cause, &c.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Gummere, J.
Melville T. Graham, a child between four and five years of age, was run over by one of the cars of the defendant company and killed, on the 10th day of April, 1896, and this suit was brought by his administrator to recover the pecuniary loss sustained by the next of kin of said decedent by reason of his death. The case came on at the Hudson Circuit, at the September Term, 1896, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of $5,000. A rule to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a new trial granted was allowed by…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MellenbergerOregon Supreme Court · 1939
- McStay v. PrzychockiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Gilmore v. PeopleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900
- SIMMEL EX REL. SIMMEL v. New Jersey Coop Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Graham v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.