Legal Opinion

Pine Bluff Sand and Gravel Company v. HDR Engineering, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided July 7, 2026No. 5:24-cv-00174Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION PINE BLUFF SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY PLAINTIFF v. No. 5:24-cv-174 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. DEFENDANT * * * * * ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT As part of a quarry expansion project on the Cumberland River, Pine Bluff Sand and Gravel Company hired HDR Engineering to construct borings that would support Pine Bluff’s conveyor. Pine Bluff later discovered that its conveyor was sliding toward the river—because of (it says) inadequate structural support caused (at least in part) by HDR’s deficient work. So…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API