Legal Opinion

Kalustian v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1990No. A89A1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant, acting pro se, filed a legal malpractice suit against appellee/attorney arising from appellee’s representation of appellant in a criminal matter. With his answer, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for appellant’s failure to file with his complaint the statutorily-required supporting affidavit of an expert. See OCGA § 9-11-9.1. The trial court granted appellee’s motion, and this appeal followed.

The trial court did not err in granting appellee’s motion to dismiss. Frazier v. Merritt, 190 Ga. App. 832 (2) (380 SE2d 495) (1989), Contrary to appellant’s…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frazier v. MerrittCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Legum v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. ABE Engineering, Inc. v. Griffin, Cochran & MarshallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API