Legal Opinion

In re Hesdra's Estate

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 28, 1892Published

Applications by creditors who had recovered judgments against decedent’s executor, as such, for leave to issue executions thereon. Denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Weiant, S.

These applications are for leave to issue execu tions under sections 1825 and 1826 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and were heard together, and submitted upon the petition and affidavits. It appears from the petition and papers-herein that the testator, Edward D. Hesdra, died about June 6, 1884, leaving a last will and testament, of which he appointed Millard F. Onderdonk the executor. That the said will was *360admitted to probate about January 6, 1888, and that letters testamentary thereof were thereupon issued to said Onderdonk. 2 N. Y. Supp. 82. That in an action brought by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clift v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Lichtenberg v. . HerdtfelderNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Schmitz v. . LanghaarNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Hauselt v. GanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882
  5. In re Hesdra's WillNew York Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API