Legal Opinion

McKinnon v. Otis Elevator Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 2007No. C051752PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

In this matter involving workers’ compensation and ah employer’s subrogation action against an alleged third party tortfeasor, we construe the employer/employee notice and consent obligations of Labor'Code sections 3853, 3859 and 3860, subdivision (a).

We conclude that when an employer fails to adequately notify its employee of its subrogation lawsuit and proposed settlement involving the alleged third party tortfeasor and fails to obtain the employee’s consent to the settlement of that suit, and when the settling alleged third party tortfeasor, prior to settlement, was or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. County of San Diego v. Sanfax Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Roe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Ventura County Employees' Retirement Ass'n v. PopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Board of Administration v. GloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dorroh v. Deerbrook Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
  2. Karton v. Ari Design & ConstructionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. Karton v. Ari Design & Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API