Legal Opinion
Shirley M. Russell v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company and Consumers Public Power District
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 31, 1962No. 16692_1Published
1Opinion of the Court
303 F.2d 674
Shirley M. RUSSELL, Appellant,
v.
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY and Consumers Public Power District, Appellees.
No. 16692.
United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.
May 31, 1962.
Charles E. Kirchner, Omaha, Neb., made argument for the appellant and filed brief.
John E. Dougherty, York, Neb., made argument for the appellee and filed brief.
Before JOHNSEN, Chief Judge, and WOODROUGH and MATTHES, Circuit Judges.
MATTHES, Circuit Judge.
1
The basic question for determination on this appeal is whether the trial court, upon motion interposed by one of the defendants, properly dismissed…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Mitchell v. MaurerSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- McDonald v. NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- Yoder v. Nu-Enamel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.