Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Lamberjack

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1994No. 93OT019PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before the court on appeal from a judgment of the Ottawa County Court of Common Pleas, which granted appellees’ motions for a directed verdict on their claims of adverse possession and easement. The lower court also • granted appellees’ motion for a directed verdict on appellants’ counterclaims. Appellants, Vincent and Joanne 1 Lamberjack (“Lamberjack”), appeal that judgment and ask this court to consider the following assignments of error:

“I. It constituted error to grant a directed verdict in favor of plaintiffs on their claim for adverse possession.”
“II. It constituted error…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Marshall v. GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Ruwe v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Reichert v. IngersollOhio Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hammerschmidt v. MignognaOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Czarnecki v. BastaOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Swanson v. Swanson, 90472 (9-25-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Am. Surface Solutions, L.L.C. v. N. Am.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Stout v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API