Legal Opinion

A-B

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 2021No. ID 4006Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

28 I&N Dec. 199

(A.G. 2021) Interim Decision #4006 Matter of A-B-, Respondent Decided by Acting Attorney General January 14, 2021 U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General (1) Matter of A-B-,

27 I&N Dec. 316

(A.G. 2018), did not alter the existing standard for determining whether a government is “unwilling or unable” to prevent persecution by non-governmental actors. The “complete helplessness” language used in Matter of A-B- is consistent with the longstanding “unable or unwilling” standard, as the two are interchangeable formulations. (2) The concept of “persecution”…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API