Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Smith

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 14, 1997No. 94-739-AppealPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLANDERS, Justice.

In the middle of trial and without any motion or other prompting from the parties or their counsel, a Superior Court justice vacated a prior consent order assigning this case for trial and reinstated the parties’ abandoned settlement agreement over the objection of one of the parties to the consent order. Because we conclude that in this instance the trial justice should have left well enough alone, we vacate the judgment and remand this case for trial.

Facts

The defendants, Z. Hershel Smith and Sanford Mills, d.b.a. Sandy Industries, were apparently in the business of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rhode Island Ophthalmological Society v. CannonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  2. State v. InfantolinoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  3. Salvadore v. Major Electric & Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. Payne v. Superior Court for Providence CountySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951
  5. Goldstein v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust National BankSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Woodland Manor III Associates v. KeeneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  2. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. In Re McBurney Law Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. Ferguson v. Marshall Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. Casa DiMario, Inc. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API