Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1990No. Civ. 890361PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Joan Ruth Smith appealed from a judgment and decree of divorce entered in the District Court for Grand Forks County. On appeal, Joan contends that the trial court lacked the requisite jurisdiction to render a judgment which dissolved the marital status of the parties and adjudicated the various incidences in their marriage. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Milton and Joan Smith were married on April 29, 1957, in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The parties have three children, one of whom was a minor during this action. At the time of their marriage, Milton was on active…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Larson v. DunnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Catlin v. CatlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. 1.43 Acres of Land in Highland TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Lohman v. LohmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
- Lustig v. LustigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.