Legal Opinion

Greenleaf v. Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works

California Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1889No. 12741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County, and from an order refusing a new trial. ' The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C. C.

This is an action to recover damages for breach of warranty of a harvesting machine, and the appeal is taken by defendant from the judgment and an order denying a new trial.

In 1884 the defendant was engaged at Stockton in manufacturing and selling a harvesting machine, known as the Shippee combined harvester. The plaintiff, a farmer in Colusa County, purchased and used during that year one of these machines. In 1885 the defendant continued to manufacture the same machine, but with certain improvements. In May, 1885, the parties entered into a written agreement for an exchange of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ebbert v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hodgkins v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API