Commuters Building & Loan Ass'n Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
This case is ruled in principle by Yonah Building and Loan Association Case, 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 376, 3 A. 2d 49. The relation of the appellant as a stockholder in the Commuters Building & Loan Association was terminated over three years before the Secretary of Banking took possession of the association because of its insolvency. It was admitted that on April 8, 1932, when the appellant ceased to be a stockholder, 1 the association was solvent. It was not shown that the subsequent insolvency was due to losses on investments made while appellant was a stockholder.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Treigle v. Acme Homestead Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Weinroth v. Homer Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Morris Resnick B. & L. Ass'n v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Publicker v. Pottash Bros. B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Williams v. WengerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Perletto v. Lancaster Avenue Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Family Savings & Loan Ass'n Shareholders' Protective Committee v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- In re Hilltop Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1939
- In re Hilltop Building & Loan Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1939
- Perletto v. Lancaster Avenue Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944