Legal Opinion

Lamping v. Diehl

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1952No. 9084PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE ADAIR:

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, Fred A. Lamping, involving the right to the use of 134 inches of the waters of Prickly Pear Creek claimed by virtue of an appropriation thereof made by plaintiff’s predecessor in interest, one John B. Wilson, on June 15, 1867, and prior to the appropriation by the predecessor in interest of the defendant, George Diehl, of waters from McClellan Creek, a tributary of Prickly Pear Creek, entering the latter creek above the headgate of plaintiff’s ditch.

This action was commenced March 27, 1947, and thereafter on October…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Quigley v. McIntoshMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Sanders v. LucasMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Zosel v. KohrsMontana Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Cook v. HudsonMontana Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Irion v. HydeMontana Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Havre Irrigation Co. v. MajerusMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Grimsley v. Estate of SpencerMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. King v. SchultzMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Allen v. WamplerMontana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Flansberg v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API