Legal Opinion

People v. Madeus & Rugante

Superior Court of Guam

Decided August 31, 2015No. CF0023-14Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

I tr{ r q s sr. k4 2 cc 10- 2 3 4 5 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM 6 7 PEOPLE OF GUAM, 8 CRIMINAL CASE NO. CF 0023-

14 V. 9

FRANCIS CHARLIE MADEUS, and 10 MINORICHY NISAR T. RUGANTE, DECISION AND ORDER 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 INTRODUCTION 15 This matter came before the Honorable Arthur R. Barcinas on the 22nd day of May, 16 17 2015, for a hearing on Defendants' Motion for Judgment on Acquittal and Motion for New 18 Trial. Assistant Attorney General Basil O'Mallan represented the People of Guam ("People"), 19 Attorney Douglas B. Moylan represented Defendant Madeus, and Attorney William Pole 20…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. EarpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Davis v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1857
  3. Pineda v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API