Legal Opinion

Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Press Pub. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 21, 1893PublishedCited by 22 opinions

In Equity. Action by the Mergenthaler Linotype Company against the Press Publishing Company and others for infringement of letters patent. Decree for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

COXE, District Judge.

This is an equity action for infringement based upon two letters patent granted to Ottman Mergenthaler for “improvements in machines for producing printing bars.” The first of these patents, No. 313,224, is dated March 3, 1885, and the second, No. 317,828, 'is dated May 12,1885.

It is insisted by the complainant that the principal invention covered by these patents is fundamental, that it has revolutionized the art of printing and is the first practical advance in the art since the days of Guttenberg. The machine which embodies this invention produces a line of type cast…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Remington Cash Register Co. v. National Cash Register Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1925
  3. McDONOUGH v. JOHNSON-WENTWORTH CO.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Westinghouse v. New York Air-Brake Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893
  5. Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API